India’s Land Warfare Doctrine 2018: Implications for Pakistan | War Strategies

Key words: India’s Land Warfare Doctrine 2018, Pakistan's tactical nuclear weapons, MIRV, PAF, War Strategies

India’s Land Warfare Doctrine 2018 is the latest version of Indian warfare doctrines in the 21st century. Land warfare doctrine (LWD) is a follow up to the previous JDIAF (Joint Doctrine of the Indian Armed Forces) that was released in 2017. Indian authorities have allocated billions of dollars under LWD in order to enhance the capabilities of armed forces in electronic and network-centric warfare (Hadi, 2019).


The Indian Army is focussed on creating IBGs (Integrated Battlegroups), expanding its capabilities in cyber warfare, inducting systems based on artificial intelligence, and introducing energy-directed weaponry to handle multiple security threats through Land Warfare Doctrine.  LWD considers multi-front scenario including external collusive threats from China and Pakistan coupled with hybrid and proxy war.

LWD’s two-front warfare endorses the strategy of managing the primary front i.e. Pakistan with available options, and managing the second front i.e. China by maintaining a defensive approach (Pandit, 2018). The concept of managing Pakistan under LWD meant to somehow punish Pakistan by launching swift operations and deep strikes to attain spatial objectives. Recent claims of surgical strikes inside Pakistan in 2019 can possibly be seen as the outcome of LWD. However, analysis of satellite data by different institutions like European Space Imaging, Australian Strategic Policy Institute, and Planet Labs Inc. denied the evidence of any damage to the target or any nearby area (Great Game India, 2019).

LWD further foresees improving the capacity and capabilities of Indian armed forces to prepare them for cyber, information, and space warfare. It recommended the adoption of modern technologies like Quantum computing, nanotechnology, and Artificial Intelligence to augment the armed services of India. LWD has promoted the idea of equipping the Indian military with disruptive skills and technologies. These technologies may include Micro Satellites, Lethal Autonomous Weapons, and Directed Energy Weapons (Bibi, 2019).

Under LWD, India has invested more to gain an advantageous status in non-contact warfare. Land Warfare Doctrine 2018 is believed to have all the essential elements required to trigger nuclear conflict and to further accelerate the arms race. So, it can be said that Pakistan has been pushed into a scenario where it has to face security challenges from the neighborhood. As a result, it would compel Pakistani authorities to utilize the available resources to improve military strength in terms of a conventional as well as the strategic build-up.

So, the important thing to understand here is that what options Pakistan can have to counter the consequences of LWD. LWD is an aggressive doctrine. Pakistan may respond to different elements of this doctrine differently. Pakistan is already having a professional military that has proved its worth against India throughout history. But, in order to manage the threats of possible surgical strikes in the future, Pakistan needs to further improve the capabilities of Special Response Force. Pakistan should continuously improve its air power readiness as well.


Pakistan has been working to overcome all the gaps in deterrence at all strategic levels. It is evident from the previous standoff between Pakistan and India. PAF’s quick response denied IAF jets to carry out any sort of damage except dropping their payloads, and forced them out of Pakistan’s air space. Cyber command is also an important dimension of military force. Pakistan needs to develop an additional and absolute cyber command for military involving CERTs (computer emergency response teams). Similarly, for improving cyber-space capabilities to manage the threats posed by LWD, Pakistan can cooperate more with China to enhance its capabilities in this sector (Bibi, 2019).

India designed LWD in a way that it can hurt Pakistan by keeping itself below the nuclear threshold of Pakistan. But, Pakistan has worked on its tactical nuclear weapons (TNWs) in recent years to deter any aggression of such modern warfare doctrines. TNWs are not as effective as traditional nuclear weapons in terms of destruction capacity. Pakistan tends to use these weapons in case its solidarity is challenged by India. The unique thing about these weapons is that these weapons have a modest operational value that can avoid large scale destruction as in the case of traditional nuclear weapons possessed by Pakistan. Moreover, the risk of deploying these weapons is also considerable that can provide Pakistan with an option to counter the elements of Indian LWD, if required.

As Pakistan is focussed on utilizing its conventional weapons as well as low yield and short-range TNWs, it has recently tested a surface-to-surface nuclear-capable missile Nasr on 24th January. This missile launch was aimed at delivering a message against the proactive strategy of offensive Indian military strategies. Pakistan should also think of investing in space assets including spy satellites in order to receive real-time information on adversary's deployment pattern, position, strategic sites, and troops' movement, etc. (Hussain, 2019).

In addition to the above-mentioned tactics and already existing capabilities of Pakistani armed forces, Pakistan will have to invest more in anti-weapons, MIRVs, and air defense systems in order to manage the aerial threats posed by LWD (in form of deep strikes) through UAVs and various types of cruise or ballistic missiles (Khattak, 2019).

But, in all this scenario, the important question that has remained unanswered is how a nuclear escalation can be avoided if aggressive strategies under Indian LWD cross the nuclear threshold of Pakistan. Both countries have the capability to fight a full-scale nuclear war and have the capability of the second strike. Thus, the consequences of the full-scale nuclear war between India and Pakistan can go beyond the imagination of the two countries.






References

Bibi, G. (2019). Deterrence Adrift: Dissecting Indian Coercive Military Doctrines 2017- 18. JSSA5(1). Retrieved from https://thesvi.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/JSSA-Vol-5-No.1-Final-31-48.pdf
Great Game India. (2019). Balakot Airstrike – Forensic Satellite Imagery Analysis. Retrieved 27 February 2020, from https://www.voltairenet.org/article204302.html
Hadi, S. (2019). Electronic Warfare Capabilities: China, India and Pakistan. Retrieved 27 February 2020, from https://cscr.pk/explore/themes/defense-security/electronic-warfare-capabilities-china-india-and-pakistan/
Hussain, Y. (2019). India’s Pakistan-Specific Land Warfare Doctrine: An Overview. Retrieved 28 February 2020, from https://southasianvoices.org/indias-pakistan-specific-land-warfare-doctrine-an-overview/
Khattak, M. U. R. (2019). Indian Military Modernisation. Strategic Studies39(1), 20-40.
Pandit, R. (2018). Artificial intelligence, robotics part of hi-tech Army warfare strategy | India News - Times of India. Retrieved 27 February 2020, from https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/artificial-intelligence-robotics-part-of-hi-tech-army-warfare-strategy/articleshow/67153564.cms

Comments